Michael Tracey on Twitter: "“Incitement” is an extremely narrowly-circumscribed concept in First Amendment law and for good reason: political speech is often highly incendiary. Dems could’ve chosen any number of methods to rebuke Trump and they go with one that undermines long-established speech protections"

Country	Code	For customers of
United States	40404	(any)
Canada	21212	(any)
United Kingdom	86444	Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
Brazil	40404	Nextel, TIM
Haiti	40404	Digicel, Voila
Ireland	51210	Vodafone, O2
India	53000	Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
Indonesia	89887	AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
Italy	4880804	Wind
3424486444	Vodafone
» See SMS short codes for other countries

1. M‏ @gaffelhans Feb 11
  Replying to @mtracey
  
  What could go wrong?
  
  1 like
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Red‏ @sposfanatic Feb 11
  Replying to @mtracey
  
  overreaching didn't have any consequences following 1st impeachment proceedings
  
  1 reply 2 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. WestSideGK‏ @georgekaiser94 Feb 11
  Replying to @mtracey
  
  First amendment legal expert over here. Everyone watch out!!
  
  1 reply 4 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Win 2K‏ @Win2kay Feb 11
  Replying to @mtracey
  
  Probably because that's the plan.
  
  20 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Ali Romero‏ @AliRomero4All Feb 11
  Replying to @mtracey
  
  They're wasting time so that they don't have to do anything real for us
  
  2 replies 3 retweets 38 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Cuomo's Anti-trend Algorithm ‏ @PhilosophicalW Feb 11
  Replying to @mtracey
  
  The goal is to muzzle anyone that speaks of their corruption. The proof has already been laid before us.
  
  5 retweets 30 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Dan Smizz ~ Guillotine Memes = Pro-Death Penalty‏ @DSmizzle55 Feb 11
  Replying to @mtracey
  
  You are aware that there can simultaneously be (a) a very high standard for finding "incitement" in speech, and (b) a person whose actions and speech reaches that standard, right?
  
  14 replies 8 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. personal space invader ‏ @prsnl_space_inv Feb 11
  Replying to @mtracey
  
  Half the point is to undermine free speech protections
  
  25 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Rene Nolten‏ @rene_nolten Feb 11
  Replying to @mtracey
  
  People who think what Trump did is legally incitement are incredibly ignorant of the long judicial history behind it. It's so strict in fact that incitement is nearly impossible..
  
  2 replies 3 retweets 23 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Mad Eye Max‏ @eyemadmax Feb 11
  Replying to @mtracey
  
  And yet, the case against Trump is pretty much air tight. The evidence would be enough to convict in a court of law where members of the jury wouldn't also be complicit in the crime.
  
  42 replies 7 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo