She actually does want to impeach ANY president who goes to war without Congressional authorization. The best reason to impeach a President. And she cant get a single cosponsor in Congress for it.
-
-
-
Exactly! She set the trap on something that is about to happen (Iran) but everyone put their faith elsewhere.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The talk this morning was that Tulsi would use her return to stage to bloody Warren’s nose. It seems more likely that her next KO could be Biden. Tulsi has repeatedly defended Biden: on his Iraq vote; on bussing; etc., it would be a blind-side knockout if she took a swing at him.
-
I know it’s too much to ask, but hopefully she goes after both of them.

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I dunno, I really liked Tulsi until I saw her on Rave Dubin and she basically parroted right-wing talking points and let him frame the terms of every topic. It was pretty hard to watch.
-
I have to agree. I still respect Tulsi but it was extremely disheartening to see her accept his RW framing without any push back. She still doesn't deserve half the sh*t she gets, even from new media, but that made me very cautious.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Emoluments clause violations alone should have gotten him impeached, by now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wonder if she’ll call out Biden in the next debate. I doubt it.
-
LOL Biden's brain has that covered.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Mike, we don't have time for rational thinking. This is the most important presidential race in world history. Have you not been paying attention
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mike why can't this be a multi-count indictment - including the scores of emoluments, obstruction of justice and other torts and indignities on the office and the Constitution?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trump should be impeached, just not for the reasons that the liberal groupthink believes (see: Puerto Rico)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not sure how they are going to get 2/3s vote in the Senate to completely remove him.
-
It depends on how the evidence develops. If the whistleblower is correct (and I think he/she likely is), the are at least six people in the White House whose testimony would be highly relevant.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Deontology > teleology I for one am much less concerned about Russiagate or Hunter Biden than I am about the blatant violations of the emoluments clause
-
Same here. His violations of the Constitution began the second he was sworn in and never stopped. It must be addressed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It tears at the fabric of our society and will give Trump wall to wall, 24/7 media coverage until the 2020 elections.
-
It's sad. Growing up attending an American international school I was once an admirer of the American dream. Times change. Now it's quickly turning into a nightmare.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The democrats are pursuing impeachment for their own narrow political objectives- not because they want to unseat trump and replace him with something better- but they have unleashed something that can be used - namely the delegitimization of the government - not just trump
-
If they delegitimize government, how will they still promote government programs?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.