Since we've had constant blockbuster reports blow up in 48 hrs, my guess is that the "whistleblower" is just whistling in the dark.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This person isn’t anonymous, they just are not yet known by the public. This is a different scenario. Considering the effort being made to not let this information get out, it’s odd your first position is to question the messenger when you don’t even know what the message is yet.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Chomsky talked about fact that treating ppl that work in gov, professionals, Party loyalists & ppl with OBVIOUS interests in things being portrayed a certain way... that treating these ppl as mostly/MOST credible is done to push
#MSM narratives as credible & devalue contrarians. -
Omg, not in this instance.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Brennan?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The article quoted “former” intelligence officials officials. Also as distasteful as what may have been said foreign policy flows out of the presidency by law and constitution under article 2. Also same for intel declassification. Bribery etc would be exceptions but otherwise..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mean it’s also possible that this is just Trump being Trump. I like like trump but he has a big mouth and likes to use it and he’s also very prone to hyperbole
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Anyone familiar with this subject knows the purpose of internal whistleblower departments is to punish whistleblowers, prevent disclousers, and protect the higher ups. That is what gives the lie away to this story, at least for me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
except that the IG said it's valid.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
IG said it's valid, Trump Toadies DNI and DOJ are breaking the law to stifle it. That means it's valid.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This smells like another media flash that will be debunked within 24 hours.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Like Michael go find Tulsi and demand a bj. She’s gonna love it!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IG is an independent office tasked w/ determining the validity of whistleblower claims. For this one, IG concluded not only that it’s valid but that it’s one of “urgent concern” to national security. This is just weakass sophistry on your part
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A good rule of thumb however When dealing with these stories are the wait 48 hours. So much of the stuff has been proven fake that I have to be a little skeptical. Especially when it comes to the intelligence community. We have to remember the IG report is coming out
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Schiffy put you up to this?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, they just frame them with collusion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.