-
-
-
The early hype around Kamala was a product of the media projecting onto her, because she was in line with their sensibilities for who the Democratic nominee should be. But of course, none of them would admit that was a factor in their baseless prognosticating
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
there was some era where she existed in the same or higher tier in Nate's tiered presidential rankings over Bernie
-
Yep, that was also the era when Nate routinely placed Bernie in the same "tier" as Mayor Pete
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There's also the crew from HBO's The Circus who flaunted Beto and didn't cover Bernie's entrance in the race. Can't wait to hear from those geniuses again soon.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Now to be fair, have you ALWAYS said Harris never had a chance? I don't give people too much shit for subscribing to the conventional wisdom unless they double down on it.
-
Pretty much everything I've said about her candidacy from the beginning has been highly skeptical of her chanceshttps://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1087884128555544577 …
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Her downfall is absolutely wonderful to watch.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's a great contrarian indicator.
-
He's a celebrity pundit now and apparently on the DNC payroll.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How the mighty have fallen.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nate has called everyone the front runner but Bernie. He even had the stones to make a front runner case for one John Frackenlooper!!!!











Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
OMG, the oligarchs wanted Kamala sooooo badly. She was all they could talk about in January/February.
-
Before her it was Pete before that Beto now it seems to maybe be Warren
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
New conversation
-
-
Hahahahahahaha!!!! Same guy that had a public meltdown on Twitter after the incorrect forecasts in the 2016 elections.
-
He gave Trump a 1/3 chance of winning
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

