You’re reading a statement I didn’t make. Whether Bolton’s departure makes American foreign policy better is mostly dependent of who replaces him. My point is that the constant revolving door of personnel and whiplash of policy is bad for America.https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1171475568971284480 …
-
-
No. Bolton wasn't a dangerous enough lunatic for Trump, the epitome of dangerous lunacy. Did Maxine Waters take away your ability to think critically when she viciously shoved your arm about an inch?
-
Um, k. If it were up to Bolton there wouldn’t be anyone left alive in the Mid East besides the Saudis and Israelis. Next level TDS.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If only it were so simple.
-
It really is that simple.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No. No, that is not the basic issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's good bevause, as photogenic as Bolton is with that stache, he is a war monger. It's bad because Trump is just floundering on foreign policy and governing in general.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes but what do you say about the original hiring of Mr Bolton? If it’s good judgment to fire him was it bad judgement to hire him?
-
Yes, obviously.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry, if the rumor about
#TraitorTomCotton being his replacement is true, America will be even worse off.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No one disagrees with firing Bolton but the basic issue is trump's instability and incompetence. He hired Bolton didn't he?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.