Happy to assist @brianstelter if he has any questions.https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/08/21/gabbard_victimized_by_dncs_dubious_debate_criteria_141055.html …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who needs research when you have emotional logic and a Mickey Mouse voice?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe I'm misunderstanding but it has been known for several months which polls qualify, no? What is not known are the underlying rules (if any) used to select these polls. But it's not unreasonable to say as long as it’s known beforehand which polls qualify, the system is fair
-
I mean, it’d be grotesquely unfair if the DNC were to just decide on the fly which polls qualify as that would make it easy for them to arbitrarily exclude or include some candidates, but that's not what they've done. (Of course the DNC is a loathsome org in many other respects)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Btw, Tulsi had some great moments in the debates so far but she has also carelessly missed some opportunities: There is no good reason why her opening and closing statements cannot be more powerful, *less generic*. In them, she should emphasize what what makes her *different*.
-
Agree. If you know they’re f*cking with you, you gotta do things to stand out. Old enough to remember “He’s no war hero” was a big thing. Put Trump on the map as someone who wasn’t going to play the PC game. The Kamala stuff as good but Tulsi missed a trick not defining herself.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
CNN is always fact-challenged!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@brianstelter doesn't have access to CNN's multi-million dollar production team with all its reseachers I guess.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I really miss the days when you were an actual journalist.https://twitter.com/BarbaraVanlaan/status/1166903209530671105 …
-
You're both right - Tracey is complaining about transparency into criteria for deciding which orgs are "approved". It's frustrating for Tulsi supporters because she's hit 2%+ in a lot of non approved polls.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Please comment
@brianstelterThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
https://democrats.org/news/third-debate/ … Gives you a lost of all that will qualify. Whether you agree with their list or not, you were told in late May which ones would count.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mtracey should set up a class to teach journalism to people like@brianstelter you can see he wants to do his best but it’s hard for him. Maybe he just needs a little help on the fundamentals of what it means to research a story before reporting it. Also lookin at you@LawrenceThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why would anyone expect
@CNN 's chief media correspondent to know such things? Parrots don't do research. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If I recall,
@Timcast had listed the 6 or so used. I do not recall his source.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mean you’re trying to argue/debate with a propaganda mouthpiece of the DNC so don’t expect much honesty or curiosity here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.