Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
mtracey's profile
Michael Tracey
Michael Tracey
Michael Tracey
Verified account
@mtracey

Tweets

Michael TraceyVerified account

@mtracey

Roving journalist, friend to all dogs mtracey@protonmail.com

NYC
patreon.com/mtracey
Joined March 2009

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Dave Weigel‏Verified account @daveweigel Aug 25
      • Report Tweet

      The "DNC rules are unfair to Gabbard" stuff has intensified because she effectively attacked Harris last month. But like all candidates who went negative, Gabbard didn't benefit much; in RCP average she's gone from 1% to 1.4%.

      73 replies 51 retweets 392 likes
      Michael Tracey‏Verified account @mtracey Aug 25
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @daveweigel

      She's at 3.3% in the RCP average in New Hampshire, and placed over 3% in a Boston Globe poll there. The Boston Globe is the newspaper with the largest circulation in the state, and yet the DNC decrees that their poll is not "approved." Hence the (legitimate) objections.

      11:31 AM - 25 Aug 2019
      • 10 Retweets
      • 108 Likes
      • Tyler DIR DIN Leah Hartigan 🌺 Xander Arena David Moore 🌺 Bebe Jaser Constituent 🌺 hilahry🌺 Michael Roberts Global Citizen🌎🏵
      14 replies 10 retweets 108 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Elizabeth Burton‏ @ZBooksTX Aug 25
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @mtracey @daveweigel

          The DNC rules are unfair, period. That they've clearly been applied to prevent Gabbard from participation is so painfully obvious one literally has to be blind not to see it. They'd likely do the same to Sanders if they thought they could get away with it.

          24 replies 0 retweets 11 likes
        3. Marcus‏ @smithma388 Aug 25
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @ZBooksTX @mtracey @daveweigel

          lololol nobody cares about Tulsi. At least people cared about Bernie so it made sense. But about two people care about Tulsi

          2 replies 0 retweets 24 likes
        4. 4 more replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Kevin Moore‏ @kmoore8228 Aug 25
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @mtracey @daveweigel

          For this to show that the DNC is targeting Gabbard they would've had to "decree" that the poll isn't approved after seeing its results. Since the guidelines for approved polls have been in place for a while I actually don't see how this is a legit objection.

          2 replies 1 retweet 27 likes
        3. The Debate Tracker  🎃‏ @TrackerDebate Aug 25
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @kmoore8228 @mtracey @daveweigel

          The objection is most valid if you assume the DNC is psychic and knew ahead of time which polls would be better and worse for particular candidates.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. End of conversation
        1. Biological Bootloader‏ @BBootloader Aug 25
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @mtracey @daveweigel

          MT vs DW, this is getting meta.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Wes King‏ @WKLBC89 Aug 25
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @mtracey @daveweigel

          RIGGING against Tulsi Gabbard. With a capital R. Period. DNC can go on with their little neoliberal insiders game...and get destroyed at the ballot box in 2020 (unless they can rig that too...they may try). 🤔

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Elizabeth Burton‏ @ZBooksTX Aug 25
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @WKLBC89 @mtracey @daveweigel

          They've rigged the ballot box more than once, as Greg Palast has shown. Tim Canova in FL has a lawsuit running over it. Or they rig the game, as they did when W. Virginia's delegates were split to give HRC more than half despite Sanders' having swept the state in a landslide.

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        4. 2 more replies
        1. New conversation
        2. MJ‏ @mscoatj Aug 25
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @mtracey @daveweigel

          So you’re saying the DNC should make a special exception for that specific poll? Wouldn’t that *actually* be rigging the debates???pic.twitter.com/6TCFFbcXbj

          3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
        3. TheRealSchwartz‏ @May_TheSchwartz Aug 25
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @mscoatj @mtracey @daveweigel

          If the results come out from the 16 approved polls we'll accept them even if we don't like them. But they are not being released. Whether or not this is intentional or not, it raises suspicion. #ReleaseThePolls

          0 replies 2 retweets 5 likes
        4. End of conversation
        1. Secret Squirrel™  🕵️ covertly dispersing nutshells‏ @mjones206 Aug 25
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @mtracey @daveweigel

          He says Tulsi "attacked" Harris (because she confronted her legitimately about her record...in a debate!), and that she "went negative." This is who these people are. They can't accept people being exposed to reality, and they hope we'll all stay in denial about the corruption.

          0 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Jared‏ @JaredinBlizzard Aug 25
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @mtracey @daveweigel

          You work for the Kremlin

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Heliopause‏ @stevesond Aug 25
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @mtracey @daveweigel

          Gabbard's RCP average is better than or within two percent of half a dozen candidates who have already qualified. And whether you like her or not she's certainly far more interesting than all those narcoleptic centrists.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. moon island‏ @islandinthemoon Aug 26
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @mtracey @daveweigel

          Let’s ask Russia Today, or better, let’s wait for one of their hard-hitting exposes to come out

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Jared‏ @Stizmaster Aug 26
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @mtracey @daveweigel

          The objections are not "legitimate"

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info