No, they ARE rigging the primary - at every stage. This is just the taster.
-
-
-
We has WikiLeaks last time, now were just going on hunches. Hopefully some patriot will give us proof again.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Anything to throw the primaries into doubt. Nice work.
-
It's true, though. The new guidelines specify meeting a number of individual contributors across x states and/or at least x% in a "major poll" but apparently it was written to be at the discretion of the DNC; Gravel got through two hurdles on fundraising, so they excl. on basis+
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Just call it what it is. Downplaying it just plays into their hand. They know full well what they are doing. Whether directly or indirectly, it’s rigging. They did it to Bernie. They’ll do it to Tulsi too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tulsi doesn’t have grassroots support lol. Just a lot of hornyboys online.
-
Funny, I’m a 54 yr old grandmother and I support her.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yup, Mike Gravel was left out even though he got a lot more donors than the half dozen of rando white men who were allowed on the debate.
-
He did meet the requirements, but they didn't include him anyway and chose to make it to the debates. They should have had 3 debates with 7 candidates each night. And this also would have been good for the quality of the debates.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So, in plainspeak, they're rigging it? They're rigging it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Arbitary, error-prone, & downright insulting for selecting the next "leader of the free world" (quotes meant to denigrate such nonsense): https://ivn.us/posts/dnc-debate-exclusions-are-arbitrary-and-anti-democratic … Orwell couldn't have named this party any better.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's called rigging
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I call that Rigging.
-
Yep. And don't expect exit polls to match results either -- if they even allow exit polls.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yep, the establishment has anointed particular candidates long in advance. Democratic operatives on the inside are now suggesting Elizabeth Warren will be the nominee. https://youtu.be/USBCbfIDseg Over my cold, dead, progressive body, she will.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rigging.....manipulating.... The definition of what is being done is up to interpretation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, how ironic that the "approved" polls released have slowed down to a crawl after the second debate. It's almost like maybe their is collision between the DNC and their "approved" pollsters. Naw, that couldn't happen. Particularly for someone they hate/fear.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can bet the farm they ARE rigging behind the scenes and will probably pull the same 2016 bullshit.' How do we overcome this corruption?
-
Support Bernie & other progressives as much as we can. Only way 2 change it is from the inside by lifting up those who honestly want 2 fight against government corruption & civil inequality.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.