how's it feel to have the same take as Mark Penn
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scary times when a subscriber based business is accountable to those subscribers.
-
Yes if they call themselves objective news.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Another Mike Tracey classic
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hard to say, it’s not like it’s healthy that the the likes of Friedman or Brooks are paid 6 figures for their opinions in the “paper of record” - twitter couldn’t do much worse
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not any worse than on anyone else IMO. NYT did push for disastrous wars with lies after lies and has lot of blood on their hands. It's substantially more than any other banned/moderated twitter user. But yes, it's all-around bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Kind of a weird way to frame it since a lot of “regular” people had a problem with the headline and were simply using this platform to express their grievance. I wouldn’t chalk this instance up to “the dangers of tech overlords” level
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
finally, someone is watching the watchers!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mike L Thirsty
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
good tweet, man
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Healthier than their garbage opinion and editorial output.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I thought the uproar was over a headline, not an op-ed. Perhaps I'm not paying enough attention to it, but there are other concerns in life. In any event, subscribers shouldn't cancel (but I've never been one) -- just state your feelings about it and demand a response. Then see.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sick
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Better than letting the New York Times have it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The New York Times lied us into Iraq
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It really is amusing when Tracey tries to paint himself as an unbiased “journalist” with shut takes like this. The power of the people have spoken over one invertebrate editor Mikey.... deal with it.
-
The idiocy of this, when biased people can control the narrative that a news source puts out, the news source is no longer an objective purveyor of truth but now simply a conduit to voice the beliefs of the subscribers. The NYT just said to hell with truth if it makes money.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.