I've never thought gun control was a magical solution to all the deeply ingrained problems that give rise to mass shootings, but someone's going to have to explain why it should be socially and legally permissible to possess an AK-47 in non-warzones
-
-
this gentleman explains that what the forefathers meant and what infringed means, and you're right, we are already having our rights infringed sincerely, please take a listen (and it's NOT Crowder. it's the historian)https://youtu.be/S3qU1lhzm1Q?t=397 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
The bump stock is easily replicated with a belt hook also and was before someone invented it and made it mainstream. While it make me very sick knowing what is happening I would rather have a well armed populace and never need to use it then a tyranny and not have it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a great point if the point is that all of these weapons and accessories should be legal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2A people are not seeing an appreciable decrease in homicides correlating to gun laws. As such, most are staunchly against any new laws, no matter how small. This is unlikely to change anytime soon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Useless laws aside , according to the constitution that would mean these infringements should not be enforced. Brady bill which bans fully automatic weapons produced after 1986 aside....
-
the fact that I cant own a fully armed ac130 is an affront to the consitution
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Correct. All such infringements must be removed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Is there anything you shouldn’t be able to own?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
SCOTUS past decisions allow states to individually regulate firearm purchases as long as it doesn't infringe on 2nd Amendment rights of citizens. Maryland's 2013 Gun Control law is one of the strictest in the country and has stood up to SCOTUS scrutiny since 2017.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This argument: "Why can't I have the things that I want when there are similar infringements I don't even care about?" It's a bad, shameful argument.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
All of which are unconstitutional
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
AK is no different than any other rifle that shoots the same ammo. It’s semi-auto so why shouldn’t it be legal?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now use the same argument on the first amendment and all the others.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To be fair Michael. Bump stock is an add on its not a weapon by itself that's why courts can infringe them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And? We’re against those too......
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.