Jack Dorsey gave Tulsi money and journalists can barely even articulate why they’re so flamboyantly upset about it. They just presume that everyone knows she’s discreditable crank -- no further elaboration needed. That’s how they police the parameters of Political Seriousness
-
Show this thread
-
Jack also gave to Yang, which I guess journalists also consider innately evil for reasons they can't articulatepic.twitter.com/BwtWCao8ll
12 replies 13 retweets 95 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @mtracey
since you're much more inclined to go after the low hanging fruit of MSM critiques of both candidates it makes sense why you think none of it has been properly articulated
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @FluorescentGrey
What exactly are you asking me to respond to? Do you think the journalists and media figures freaking out about Jack's contribution subscribe to your niche criticisms (which I've also addressed)? No, they're screaming about the typical Assad/Russia/"alt right" nonsense
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
no i don't think that, but you've come to reply to my tweets about Tulsi Gabbard multiple times and then not followed up when i've actually tried to have a substantiative discussion with you, more of a general request/criticism
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
Sorry, I tend to get a lot of tweets. I'd do a video discussion and address whatever issues you may have, if you want
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
no need for an apology, i'd be totally down for that.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.