Jack also gave to Yang, which I guess journalists also consider innately evil for reasons they can't articulatepic.twitter.com/BwtWCao8ll
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Jack also gave to Yang, which I guess journalists also consider innately evil for reasons they can't articulatepic.twitter.com/BwtWCao8ll
In a post on Gizmodo, which I'm not linking to because it's trash, Tulsi is described as very "strange," "an apologist for war criminals," beloved by David Duke, and insufficiently committed to the metaphysical certitude of Russia collusion. Therefore Jack is bad for giving her $pic.twitter.com/38zjeRMVsH
Vanity Fair has nothing substantial to say except that she's "come under fire for her past anti-gay views and meeting with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad." Have these journalists ever had an original thought in their entire lives? They just read from the same pathetic scriptpic.twitter.com/jb3xNJ9P70
“Politics is the Entertainment Division of the Military Industrial Complex.” — Frank Zappa. / “We have to continue our endless wars because... uh... um, we have to stay engaged.” - Ryanpic.twitter.com/CGh7s6eHJd
They are afraid of Tulsi. She is the only candidate who can beat Trump.
Yup and mainstream press doesn't want Trump to be defeated because he's their gravy train. Without him what will the media hyperventilate about and obsess over?
Journalists are just told and paid to discredit Tulsi in any way possible using the same old smear tactics because she is a threat to the establishment.
I’m surprised that @jack doesn’t understand that @TheDemocrats have already anointed @KamalaHarris. The rest is kabuki theater.
He's probably given money to a number of candidates.
No. I heard only max to Tulsi & a little bit to yang
She's just the mother lode of bad ideas, and an Assad toady. Wait, is toady the right word? I'm not entirely sure what it means...
They fact that they can convince themselves that someone who served in the military and opposes more wars is a crank, comes awfully close to 1984 style hate. I don’t how to understand their completely moral inversion of reality, other than extreme Orwellian conditioning.
The thought occurred to me that jack may have donated to Tulsi and Yang so that later if he has to defend in court the censorship in twitter, he can say I financially supported politicians that were censored or their supporters were censored as a means of defending their policies
These "journos" to whom you refer exhibit their foolishness with such cackling. They show themselves to be "tools for hire"...simply put.
Pack mentality. "Everyone knows..."
On any matter, when they "discuss" like this, it is a sure sign that you're hearing from a discreditable crank.
Discuss in scare quotes because it's the exact opposite of discussion.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.