Second national poll with Tulsi at 2%, one more and she qualifies for the September debate https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/al25duedar/econTabReport.pdf …pic.twitter.com/4OWb4hqjkq
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
OK, clarification here. I think the campaign could make a reasonable argument that it's arbitrary to count YouGov polls when they're sponsored by one news organization (CBS) but not another (The Economist). So, put an asterisk on this poll as "qualifying"https://twitter.com/ZachMontellaro/status/1149330533601726471 …
You're off here. YouGov polls do not ALONE count for the debate. That particular YouGov poll counts because of CBS, which is a DNC-approved poll sponsor; The Economist is not. Gabbard needs 2 percent in 4 approved polls for September. She's at 0 currentlyhttps://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dHSFg0jrAeIAqDlFZqAu-5N2x-wk8PT-6H4DbCendUM/edit?usp=sharing …
Thanks for the clarification. It seems wildly arbitrary to count YouGov polls as qualifying when they're sponsored by one news organization (CBS) but not another (The Economist) and the campaign could make a plausible argument to that effect.
I noticed though that that's listed as a Yougov/CBS poll while in the one you cite they're partnered with The Economistpic.twitter.com/Yhznm8WHOA
YouGov only qualified in the CBS/YouGov poll. The TheEconomist/YouGov polls do not count. CBS is a DNC accepted pollster that is why they said ok to the CBS/YG state polls. The Economist and YouGov are not accepted pollsters. Just to set the record straight.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.