Are they asking different candidates to drop out or just one in particular?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
"Suggests"is the operative word. "vibrancy and robustness" is a bit of a stretch when there are basically 17 different flavors of Eric Swallwell running.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm all for a wide range of candidates, but we absolutely need to change the logistics to actually accommodate such a field. RCV/IRV instead of FPTP would be a necessary step.
-
As it currently exists, the the election dynamics, from the multiple spoiler effects in play to weird delegate rules (only delegates for candidates with 15% with vague exceptions for votes in a district) could be a full time job for Nate Silver in place of his awful punditry.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I just want
@marwilliamson around a littler longerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are too many dem candidates, however, there aren’t many differences in their policies. Except for few, most of the dem candidates are batshit crazy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Missing the big picture is what Democrats do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah sure. Vibrant democracy and all that. I just wish some of them would have found another way to increase their future salaries when they become lobbyists. the debates are like a beauty contest with the 1 minute answers about ending world hunger...only everyone's old and ugly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Democratic operative?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
...or simply "Socialism, it does a body good"
End of conversation
-
-
-
A healthy democracy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All the candidates running is to atomize the voting insuring that Bernie does not receive enough votes to be the nominee. As for vibrancy & robustness in the Democratic Party
#getrealThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think it suggest (just like the GOP in 2016) lots of attention-seekers. There does come a point of negative returns with an increasing number of candidates. ~RT: "A huge field suggests vibrancy and robustness in the [Democrat] party."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
symbolic of the controlling behavior which is today's democrats
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.