I was inundated yesterday with activists and journalists proclaiming that they now demand conditions-free release of all detained migrants and total border abolitionism. If that's your position, OK, but it's going to require more than emotionalistic slogans to defend it in public
-
-
I have a standing offer to engage on the substance with any online critic who believes I'm evil for whatever reason. (Not to "debate," to converse.) This offer is almost never taken up. Which is unfortunate, because it reflects a broader resistance to good faith engagement
Show this thread -
No one is obligated to engage with me directly. However, in a pluralistic democracy do you do have to engage with people who might not share your principles. The way this issue is talked about, especially online, makes that increasingly impossible
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Half-pinions abound. Child's logic wrapped in dopamine addiction. Has a single proponent of this mass entry offered a hard number for how many the country can manage ? More likely the goalposts will move constantly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
love it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
characterizing a rising popular feeling of moral obligation as “emotionalistic” “elite opinion”—how’s that working out for you?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It’s “bizarrely angry” to not want babies in cages?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.