...“would countenance the disinformation”? Is he guilty of corrupting the youth? If so, meet him at The Forum with a tall glass of hemlock and let’s get this party started.
-
-
Nah, He's embracing the kind of bullshit that leads to dictatorship. Basically an authoritarian posing as a lefty.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
The promise of both democracy & modernity is to enter the public forum armed with ideas to bring about change without bloodshed. Aaron’s not an enemy. He has a different take...my god, the republic can surely withstand a difference of opinion.
2 replies 0 retweets 23 likes -
He doesn't have a different take. He has a fiction he has invented, even after I've caught him acknowledging that he is suppressing actual facts on two occasions, wrt Manafort sharing polling data and (on numerous occasions) wrt the Trump Tower Moscow deal.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Great! That should be easily dispatched in a public forum.
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Yes. I've dispatched it here, repeatedly. That's why I now feel free to treat him as the deceptive hack he insists on being, and not to treat challenges to "debates" as anything more than just posing. He's not good faith, and those who get fooled into thinking he is are chumps.
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
This is all projection. You bought into, & still won't give up on, the Trump-Russia conspiracy theory. You told the FBI your source played a major role in the "Russian attack." And you repeatedly say your claims are corroborated by "the public record" without citing specifics.
4 replies 3 retweets 29 likes -
Hi Aaron. Can you link where said my "source" as you describe it had a "major role"? I mean, I know you make shit up a lot but just checking.
4 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
This is getting too easy. Here's you writing that "I went to the FBI and provided information on a person whom I had come to believe had played a significant role in the Russian election attack on the US." You then make clear this person is a source. https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/07/03/putting-a-face-mine-to-the-risks-posed-by-gop-games-on-mueller-investigation/ …pic.twitter.com/TavDiQviZj
3 replies 2 retweets 21 likes -
Hi. Do you realize that "major" and "significant" are different words? And also that I did not say that part was Mueller related? This is complex, I understand, Aaron. Maybe one of your friends is up to it?
5 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
LOL, please elaborate on the purportedly crucial distinction between the words "major" and "significant" -- I'm in the mood for some comedy tonight
-
-
Replying to @mtracey @emptywheel and
How about this: Butterfield played a significant (but not major) role in the Watergate scandal; Erlichman played a major (and also significant) role in the Watergate scandal. Do you see the difference?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.