I'm okay with it. Someone's gotta keep China in check (in South East Asia) and it sure as hell isn't regional navies.
-
-
-
South china sea is a case in point too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interesting way to characterize rendering aid. A little too much mustard on this one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pretty sure the economic stability provided by free movement of the vessels in the region...has both Global and American interests.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, still not fine with it. We shouldn't even be there to be doing this in the 1st place. .-.-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
'people hate the police until they need the police.' or at least until they're told they need the police.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is in our interest to maintain that waterway
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep, they don't understand that phrase whatsoever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
Sounds like a protection racket ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No we're not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not me!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't like that we are the police but I also understand of we leave that role someone like Russia will step in and that sleeping giant will be irreversible once we concede our global readiness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not sure if you’ve been paying attention but lots of people aren’t fine with it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The U.S. has always maintained a military presence in the name of "national interests" going back over 100 years. "no US vessels involved and "other side of the world" are meaningless facts. If this was a shipping issue between Malaysia and Indonesia the U.S wouldn't be there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because oil
-
I wish they would just suck all the oil dry I am so sick of greed and the destruction it causes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Absolutely Ridiculous!!! The administration is really expecting the American People to just go to WAR over any little disputes that didn’t even directly involve the US, did they forget about the Bush Lies about Iraq of “Weapons of Mass Destruction!!!” THIS IS EVEN MORE FLIMSY!!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.