John continues to have a hard time comprehending the point, which is that he and other CIA/intelligence colleagues have been ascribed quasi-journalistic credibility since 2016. I'm against such officials having an outsized role in shaping public opinionhttps://twitter.com/john_sipher/status/1135741482478911488 …
-
-
1. The public needs to be more media literate, which would your core concern 2. There is a place for expertise in this conversation 3. You once again conflate a declination decision on criminal conspiracy w/ collusion
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Huddle?”
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sipher noun, often attributive
Si·pher | \ ˈsī-fər \
Definition of sipher (Entry 1 of 2)
1a : ZERO sense 1a
b : one that has no weight, worth, or influence : NONENTITYThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
OR MAYBE she represents dem congress that needs reelection while dem pres candidate have very different needs ATM. Just sayin’
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd reject yours but you have none already
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You appear to conflate “authority” with “expertise”. These two things are not quite the same...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree troll-heartedly but prefer the overt CIA domestic public opinion operations to the covert.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The "Russia expert" has been completely wrong about Russiagate. I'm a guy on his couch typing on a phone and I knew more about this hoax then John.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The collusion narrative & “investigations” had/have nothing 2do w Russia. If they did, for a start, someone investigating “Russian interference” wld ask
@HillaryClinton some questions. Nobody called alleged@dnc server hack an attack until@POTUS won. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.