For more, see this piece at Lawfare by Harvard Law professor @AndrewMCrespo arguing that Mueller would not have been bound by the OLC memo's prohibition on charging a sitting presidenthttps://www.lawfareblog.com/mueller-bound-olcs-memos-presidential-immunity …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I just watched Jerry’s statement after watching Bob’s statement and I must say that Jerry must have watched a different Mueller press conference.That he numerous times called Don and Bill liars...I’d support HIS arrest for libel
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He literally just said in the press conference that it wasn’t an option
-
Yeah, that's false
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
viewer fatigue is setting in for this topic i don't care much anymore
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
His whole speech just seemed kind of full of shit, reaffirming the whole “there just wasnt enough evidence it doesn’t mean he didn’t do it.” narrative
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
he hedged, adding much innuendo = this was always his real work, assuming he couldn't put together an open and shut case. dirty cop.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Way past time to investigate uranium one and Clinton Foundation. Real crimes and cover ups in our country. Mueller was looking for a crime so he tried to create one. Trump never obstructed anything.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please refer to Mr. Dershowitz's remarks today re: Mueller. I now agree.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That fkd up "corrupt" policy at the DOJ invites and enables criminal conduct of a Sitting POTUS. It's a DOJ policy it's NOT THE LAW OF THE LAND!
-
Congress needs to legislate to eliminate that DOJ policy, which is not supported by the Constitution or existing federal law. That policy is currently being used by Barr and the DOJ leadership to obstruct justice.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank You. And none of his findings have been put to the test of full examination in court. People fail to grasp that it is inconceivable for a prosecutor to not charge someone and then paint a defendant as guilty. It is anathema to the core ofour system.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ken Starr charged President Clinton eleven felonies. Nothing stooped Mueller from indicting Trump. Just couldn't prosecute.pic.twitter.com/6wRF2WEkN2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My conspiracy theory: Republican Mueller is 'secretly' pro-GOP and by weaseling out of a definitive finding is trying to sustain the Dems' self-destructive Trump-Russia madness into the primary and election.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I want to know at what point did Mueller decide he wouldn’t indict Trump based on this decades-old policy. After that point, Mueller knowingly wasted govt resources and American tax dollars on ANY remaining efforts to dig around.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mueller seems to definitely be on the side of those that dont want Barr to investigate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No, Michael, no!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The president can be charged with a crime, but it requires his consent. The DoJ policy is not to consent, but the president could override that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This just means we must have more investigations. We must.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.