It’s fantasy to suggest that “collusion” and “obstruction” are ever going to be separable in the context of a turbo-charged impeachment proceeding. There’s no way around it: Dems are moving to impeach Trump on the basis of a debunked conspiracy theoryhttps://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-oped-the-runaway-impeachment-train-20190528-jfedgjwbjnegrjxxehrzwx53fa-story.html …
-
-
Whatever Mueller pronounces today, it won't change the fact that zero Americans were indicted for conspiracy with Russia, and it won't change that his Report destroyed the entire "collusion" narrative. But Dems will latch onto anything he says to further their impeachment crusade
Show this thread -
Mueller still occupies the Special Counsel position (and thus remains an employee of the Justice Department) so it's possible that he just announces his work is complete and he is leaving the DOJ. Which will make it easier to get him to testify before Congress
Show this thread -
Mueller just gave impeachment-crazy Democrats a fresh injection of Russia fever. Initiation of impeachment proceedings is likelier than ever now. Mueller specifically tailored his statement to instigate impeachment: I don't see how anyone could read it otherwise
Show this thread -
In this statement Nadler says it's a "lie" to suggest that the Mueller Report showed "no collusion." It therefore stands to reason that in any forthcoming impeachment proceeding, which Nadler would oversee, "collusion" would be a major component. See?https://twitter.com/RepJerryNadler/status/1133759926822723584 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not only that, they that insist that average citizens are going to distinguish between obstruction as a statutory crime and obstruction as a political offense as defined by the House.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True. But even if they do, it would still be a losing argument. If anyone wants to try that argument out on me, I'd love to have my ground tested
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I thought Impeachment could only proceed if it can't fail! As a "failed" impeachment is kinda bad!?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I love the way that S.I.A. think that people working at jobs and living paycheck to paycheck really give a shit at this point, given no fait accompli from the investigation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which is what they’re betting on
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can just scroll through your replies and see you're right on this. This is basically the Clinton impeachment all over again.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t think it’s that hard to understand that even if Trump didn’t collude with Russians, he obstructed to impede investigation of his many other crimes.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
I hope he says that congressional dems can pound sand and that the investigation is over.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've been saying this for weeks. Obstructing an investigation that turns out to be spurious is still a crime, (depending on where you live) but it's the very definition of a technicality. Most people will see no harm & thus no foul.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I liked the way you put it a few weeks ago, impeachment for obstructing a fraud.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.