Gabbard’s campaign is a rumour at the moment, so the mischaracterization hardly matters.
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Never let facts interfere with a preferred narrative.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We are supposed to elect someone because they are female? Why?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Instructive thread on the quality of NYT's reporting/opinionshttps://twitter.com/JasonButtrill/status/1131931404470824960 …
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
They mean they are making the case by being GOOD CANDIDATES. Which I believe you think Tulsi is? Nobody is saying "vote for me because I'm a woman". The NYT sucks but you are taking this way out of context. As usual.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.