And readily accept the Intelligence Services' claims that such transparency will burn national security sources. Which of course is the reason no paper ever published the Pentagon Papers or Snowden files...oh wait...
Dems and allied pundits have been screaming for years that we must know every last detail about "Russian interference" in 2016, and have launched multiple exhaustive investigations pursuant to this. But now they scream that we MUST NOT know about CIA/FBI conduct in 2016. Very odd
-
-
-
It’s almost as if you lack any understanding of nuanced thought.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We have to know
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not odd at all; it's that the Trump administration is so unscrupulous and has proven itself so tone-deaf when dealing with allies, that experts in intelligence are worried about sources and methods being exposed willy-nilly. Why do you pretend not to know this?
-
Because this is personal for Michael. It’s completely obvious his butthurt is a result of not receiving the respect he believes he deserves from his peers. This is why he’s become a tool for Fox News, but works to position it as being a voice of reason speaking to that audience.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
How can
@PBS be so partisan? I am really flabbergasted. No check and balance here. Only protect cover up.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are you questioning that there was Russian interference in that election? It’s hard to know with your overuse of quotation marks in every other tweet.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.