An investigation opened on authority of an official without a predicate is an abusive power. The Russian interference had a predicate.
-
-
-
Yes, but the predicate was a FISA warrant, where the credibility of the underlying sources was questionable. And if the campaign of the incumbent administration’s party has had a role in generating info to the FBI, that fact must be disclosed to the court with full transparency.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not odd at all. When America is falling apart and quickly self-destructing since 9/11, the only thing stopping the people from rising up against the federal gov't is for the government to yell "WAIT! LOOK OVER HERE! NOT AT US!" and it works. It's self-preservation from the elite.
-
They have done it before, and they will do it again and again to keep buying themselves time. The best way to stop an internal threat of resistance is to give the people something else they can be angry at, and its always a conjured threat such as a country, race, or religion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
consistently, they defend their power by abusing it for 3yrs and then refusing to backup their original spying with anything other than narrative, as they continue to abuse power and continue their witch hunt.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Very predictable. No need to pussyfoot this, we know what the media is doing. It’s a challenge, as we obviously must protect freedom of the press... but we have to push back on the propaganda the media peddles. Former intel operatives should not be media celebrities.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If Trump says the sky is blue, they will say the president is color blind. Whatever Trump wants, they don’t want. If Trump says we should protect the information from becoming public, they’d say we should release it all. The left schtick is predictable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Very odd. But totally predictable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
We have to know
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or cynical.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And very telling also.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That was
@OnPointRadio week in the news.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They keep stepping in doo doo. Lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Well if that's the game (of investigating the investigators) then I believe it would be ill advised to refuse that tasking, and contrarily fruitful to play along. Kallstrom, Guilianni and the FBI's N.Y. Field Office aka TrumpLand was up to all sorts of shenanigans.
-
Be interesting to reveal their text messages.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And readily accept the Intelligence Services' claims that such transparency will burn national security sources. Which of course is the reason no paper ever published the Pentagon Papers or Snowden files...oh wait...

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
As a patriotic, security state-fearing American, I know that If the CIA interfered, they must have had a good reason!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.