Seems like a good way for them to "randomly" select people they don't like and group them away from the candidates they don't want challenged.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh come on. It's useless to watch Bernie and Biden debate zeroes like Bennet or Hickenlooper and not each other.
-
I want to see Inslee fight Hickenlooper no matter what happens
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It'd be good if it's truly random. But I think we all know it's not going to be.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree. The debates will be far more substantive if the low-polling outsiders are mixed in with the front-runners. If you are on the ballot in upcoming primaries, voter should hear you. Besides, the polls are often radically flawed and misleading.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And overrated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nate is not demanding.
-
yet he is
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
they should really implement a battle royal format, maybe then De Blasio stands a chancepic.twitter.com/G877gZ7ncr
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This article from Gallup in June 2007 illustrates your point wellhttps://news.gallup.com/poll/27985/where-election-stands-june-2007.aspx …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Whichever debate doesnt have Biden in it is the kids table. If Biden & Bernie dont get to debate the whole thing is pointless. I will be turbomad if Tulsi doesn't get to call Biden a shill to his face on natiinal TV.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since when are you not into populism?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree that is reasonable, but I don't know why you have to insert Data Boy into the conversation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nah 538 did a good job. They gave trump about a 30% chance of winning
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
There's 24 candidates. How would you propose they all debate?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The 2% cut-off was in homes of keeping
@TulsiGabbard off the stage. Dems are as wholly owned by the war pigs as the GOP. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Silver is trash. Why people pay him any attention is beyond me. He got Obama's election correct. Why? Because Obama actual led in the polls. Many other times he has been wrong. He had Hillary in a landslide

-
So Dems are "stacking" the deck again....give the GOP credit in 2016...they gave them tiered debates
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.