Also, “had unpleasant consequences” isn’t a justification for criminal charges.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And irrelevant even if true
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not really. Julian will be tried in Leonie Brinkema's espionage court under Espionage Charges where U.S. Government control over what materials may be presented. what public will ever be allowed to learn, and where defendants do not have the right to rebut or defend themselves
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
it was actually someone from the Guardian publishing a password that made the names of people from Manning's documents public, not Assange or WikiLeaks. Yet he is now being charged with revealing the names?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wtf. @ChiefOfSass
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
unfortunately, as I understand it, the government will not have to prove these elements of the indictment in order to obtain a conviction.
-
Correct. Defendants can't rebut or defend themselves. Conviction rate for espionage cases under Judge Leonie Brinkema (Assanges' judge) is 100%.
#ShowTrial - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
It’s not “made up” , do some research.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Assange published authenticated factual docs & video of war crime atrocities leaked to him by Manning, the EXACT SAME WAY that NYT & Time Magazine published Sy Hersh's exposure of the My Lai massacre that a source leaked that was being covered up all the way to U.S. JCOS.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.