Hold on. Isn't this the publication that made "fearless and adversarial" into a fetish, desperately seeks anonymous whistleblowers on its own site, and cowardly gave cover to an anonymous "source" in Al Qaeda? One staffer breaking ranks merits this kind of hostility? Really?https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1121767551967617027 …
-
-
They're big boys. They can defend themselves. They certainly have the money & the power. Too bad these brave journalists won't even answer the simplest questions about their billionaire patron and why he shut down the Snowden archives. That's a much bigger story that you ignore.
-
You can ask them about that subject all you want (and as far as I know they've addressed it) but I'm talking about an entirely separate subject.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.