Probably.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @ewinsberg @ggreenwald and
Why don't you regard Wittes and Wheeler as counter-examples to Greenwald & co.'s claims that everyone (but them) got it wrong? To my mind, that's the problem with Greenwald & co. Wittes and Wheeler aren't outliers, opinion-wise.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I'm honestly curious where you think I advanced a cartoonish version of the collusion scenario. Are you sure you're not confusing my work with that of others?
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Wittes did advance a cartoonish view of collusion, such as routinely intimating that every "bombshell" (about which he chanted his Boom! slogan) was indicative of collusion. As we now know, the Trump Tower meeting (referenced here) had zero to do with anything collusive.pic.twitter.com/AtHGUZFCOX
2 replies 18 retweets 26 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
There was never any good reason to believe that a meeting facilitated by a British music promoter and which resulted in the provision of nothing of value was indicative of collusion.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.