Again, Aaron. You're pretending that you correctly identified the point Tracey was attempting to make, which is what my response addressed. You did not. The first step here is for you to try to identify the point Tracey was making. Go ahead, go try to ID that. You can do it!
-
-
Actually you DID make a claim about what evidence Mueller had, suggesting he would gain from talking to Kilimnik. Which is where Aaron went so badly embarrassingly wrong, believing your claim about the evidence Mueller had on that point.
-
But for now, I'll note that your recent takes on RU investigation are: 1) More people should listen to sworn liar George Papadopoulos' story that conflicts w/known evidence 2) More people should listen to witness tamperer Kilimnik's claims that conflict w/known evidence OK.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So insane that Tracey says Report obliterates "collusion" despite the 100+ pages of sketchy contacts b/t Team Trump & Russia, many of which it couldn't explain, en route to finding significant evidence of collusion, but concluding it insufficient to indict under conspiracy laws
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.