Hey Marcy, what “evidence reviewed by a judge” are you talking about? Please cite it here. I’m curious why you think it bolsters your view that Kilimnik really is a spy.
-
-
-
Replying to @aaronjmate @emptywheel
Marcy: "Aaron's so fucking dumb"; Kilimnik is a spy, according to "evidence reviewed by a judge." Aaron: What is that judge-reviewed evidence? Marcy:pic.twitter.com/vqYFOWerJt
1 reply 1 retweet 17 likes -
Replying to @aaronjmate
Aaron; Let's see if you we can help you help yourself. Go back to the point that Tracey was making, which you misunderstood. What was it?
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Rather than deflect, let's see if you can actually answer my question on the issue at hand, and cite the "evidence reviewed by a judge" that you argue bolsters your view that Kilimnik is a spy.pic.twitter.com/SbdKLeU6OP
6 replies 1 retweet 23 likes -
Replying to @aaronjmate @emptywheel
Prediction: you won't actually answer that, because you're well aware that the judge's "evidence" does not bolster your claim. That's what happens when you're confronted with people who engage with you on the actual facts (and hence why you're only left w/ insults & deflection).
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @aaronjmate
Again, Aaron. You're pretending that you correctly identified the point Tracey was attempting to make, which is what my response addressed. You did not. The first step here is for you to try to identify the point Tracey was making. Go ahead, go try to ID that. You can do it!
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
I didn't overlook it. Kilimnik wasn't not indicted for anything to do with the receipt of polling data or any matter that had bearing on a conspiracy or collusion question. I knew Kilimnik had been indicted on an unrelated obstruction matter involving Ukraine.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
What was the charge, Tracey?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
The charge was not anything stemming from Kilimnik's receipt of polling data, Marcy.
-
-
That was not the question Mr Big Yellow Highlighter. The question was what the charge was. It's utterly relevant to explain why you were laughably wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Your obsession with the color highlighter I choose to use is just another example of why engaging with someone as delusional and malicious as you is having diminishing returns.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
