The philosopher Bertrand Russell famously elucidated the fallacy of this thinking. He was referring to religious belief, but then again, Trump/Russia has all the hallmarks of classic stubborn supernatural dogmatismpic.twitter.com/7ih9ulF3Qs
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The philosopher Bertrand Russell famously elucidated the fallacy of this thinking. He was referring to religious belief, but then again, Trump/Russia has all the hallmarks of classic stubborn supernatural dogmatismpic.twitter.com/7ih9ulF3Qs
I’m a human that’s not a bunny because I have none of the traits that define what a bunny is. The Easter Bunny is a bunny. I am not a bunny, therefore I am not the Easter Bunny. The Mueller Report just says it doesn’t have enough evidence to prove collusion. Still might be true.
But you don't know for sure that you're not being deceived by your subjective consciousness and that you are in fact the Easter Bunny. Which is to say, you can't disprove a negative with 100% epistemological certainty
1. I am human 2. All humans are not the Easter Bunny 3. Therefore, I am not the Easter Bunny
I made it my Twitter handle
I guess I COULD be the Easter bunny. No long ears, no fuzzy tail, and generally I don’t hop. Only have two offspring. I DO like chocolate. You win.
1. It’s impossible to prove a negative. 2. Therefore, all negatives can not be proven. 3. But “all negatives can not be proven” is a negative. 4. Therefore, at least one negative can be proven 5. Therefore, it is possible to prove some negatives.
Maybe spend the next three years in law school and you might begin to understand some of these concepts.
He needs at least a Bachelor degree (and a certain grade score) to attend Law School. And I also don't think he's smart enough to get anything they'd teach him.
It’s the prosecutor’s job to affirmatively establish guilt after determining there is sufficient cause to proceed, not to prove a crime did not occur. At least American jurisprudence it is.
Plausible Deniability will be maintained.
@jimmy_dore @aaronjmate @RealTimBlack @caitoz @ggreenwald @joerogan @grahamelwood @RonPlacone @miserablelib @ChrisLynnHedges @AssangeMrs @CornelWest
Soon these asshats will have to explain why 2 years of Russiagate Media Hysteria mislead the Public as to the fraudulent origins “justifying” spying on Trump: FISA court was defrauded because Woods Procedure wasn't adhered to; Steele Dossier was the only predicating “proof”.pic.twitter.com/yYwjBph1HD
“if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state.” .. on obstruction.. on evidence Russia - deleted communications and encrypted communication.. open to reading
Prove I'm not an extraterrestrial hiding in human guise. You can't.
Hell, according to the left, if I simply identify as an extraterrestrial, that is good enough for them, no questions asked!
This is a bogus straw man argument. The report lays out lots of evidence of improper and unethical contacts. It lays out that Trump lied repeatedly about these contacts and told his aides to lie. While these may not be prosecutable crimes, the information is extremely damning.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.