So are you also distrusting Robert Mueller? He's the one who declared, definitively and in plain English for all to read, that no conspiracy was established. Or is he part of the conspiracy now?
-
-
Replying to @mtracey @KevinMKruse
There's a big gap between "didn't happen" and "not proven." You and Barr are claiming Mueller said the first one, but Mueller said the second.
5 replies 10 retweets 774 likes -
Replying to @studentactivism @KevinMKruse
So the hapless Robert Mueller, with the entire United States Treasury behind him, 19 extremely aggressive prosecutors, and a massively broad mandate, simply failed in his task? Is that what you're saying?
29 replies 4 retweets 32 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @KevinMKruse
I'm saying that if you're making claims about what Mueller said, those claims should be based on what Mueller said, rather than with what Barr said Mueller said.
5 replies 5 retweets 756 likes -
Replying to @studentactivism @KevinMKruse
Here's a direct quote from Mueller, in the Report that is now public and anyone can read: "The investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government"
19 replies 7 retweets 42 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @KevinMKruse
Yep. And on literally the same page he urged people not to make the mistake that you and Barr are making: "A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts."
2 replies 4 retweets 64 likes -
Replying to @studentactivism @KevinMKruse
Yeah, because you can't prove a negative. His entire mandate was to establish conspiracy or coordination, aka collusion. He did not do so. This really isn't difficult to understand.
7 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @KevinMKruse
I have no quarrel with this tweet. But a couple of hours ago, you said Mueller "has definitively announced that he concluded there was no collusion." And THAT, my friend, is horseshit. It's a lie.
2 replies 1 retweet 45 likes -
Replying to @studentactivism @KevinMKruse
Your increasingly deranged semantic games are horseshit. We all know what the purpose of this investigation was: to establish collusion.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @KevinMKruse
Mueller said explicitly that he took no position on whether collusion had happened. You said he "definitively announced that he concluded there was no collusion." Pointing out that contradiction isn't a semantic game.
2 replies 0 retweets 27 likes
No he didn't. That's a complete lie. He took the position that he could not establish collusion.
-
-
Replying to @mtracey @KevinMKruse
Oh, god. I thought you were bullshitting, but you just don't understand what the words mean. "We didn't establish that X is true" isn't the same as "we concluded that X is false." He said the first one, you said he said the second.
4 replies 0 retweets 36 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.