It’s a major sea change for top-tier Democratic candidates (Sanders, Warren, Harris so far) to not attend the annual AIPAC conference. Would’ve been unthinkable not long ago. But AIPAC brought it upon themselves; the false “bipartisan” consensus on Israel is rapidly dissipating
-
-
Unless they condemn the Golan Heights land seizure, they are full of it.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Depends on their reasoning for not attending. Sanders said it was due to platforming racists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They will
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Did they refuse AIPAC money? That is key test.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Michael, out of 200 countries in the world, is there any country you hate aside from Israel?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I just had retweeted the prior post and was singing the praises of these Dems for standing up to AIPAC. I guess not so great after all. Let’s see if they distinguish themselves on the issue in the debates. I’m skeptical.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your point is still a good one,
@ZaidJilani notwithstanding. Dems did not stand up at SOTU when Trump mentioned shift of embassy to Jerusalem. They also did not stand when Trump said a full sentence of praise for Israel. The Dems are aggressively anti-neocon, despite Schumer etcThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.