Again, nothing wrong with asking adversarial questions of presidential candidates. That's what journalists *should* do. Issue with CNN (Dana Bash in particular) is that their adversarialism is cheap, phony, selective, and doesn't actually challenge established power.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
she could always boycott CNN
-
She knew what they would do, but she was brave enough to face them knowing the amount of viewers that would be watching. Plus, she nailed it!pic.twitter.com/1TlUjsTiYJ
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Yet
@TulsiGabbard handled it with dignity and grace. She was so presidential and
!! Love her!!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Has anyone ever heard a normie in regular conversation criticize the US government for insufficient belligerence toward Bashar Al Assad's government? These planted questions are ridiculously transparent.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They haven't learnt from their treatment of candidates they don't like that it only fuels the support for that candidate even more...large media entities are still thinking it's the 90s and think they can get away with these obvious biases.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Still, giving
@TulsiGabbard the chance to leave Bash dumstruck when she made clear that the word of the DoD and the UN was not good enough for her was worth any number of adversarial questions.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yellow Journalism at its best..
End of conversation
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Remember that CNN once had Army Psyops on the payroll! You cannot trust CNN, MSNBC, or FOX!
-
"once"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And the severity of Bash’s demeanor, as if she was interviewing a suspected felon, strongly contrasted with Tulsi’s open, genial approach.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@CNN wants to keep its defense contractor sponsors and intelligence community ghouls happyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right? You could see it all over Bash's face, too - when she was gearing up to ask the bait questions. Tulsi is really strong, though, and it backfired.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They did the same to Bernie. When you look at the questions Bernie was asked (and by who), and then look at the questions Kamala Harris was asked, you can see a huge difference.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It started before the townhall even aired. In advertisements, they pondered "can Tulsi, explain her dark past, yadda yadda", paraphrasing of course. Nothing like that when previewing the other two candidates.
#TulsiTownHallThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oddly enough I've heard about Buttigieg since '16 from Dr. E Michael Jones. I disagree with him on a lot but EMJ did predict on the Peter Helland that Buttigieg would be the Goldman Sachs usury/sodomy candidate (look up Dante's Inferno) for this election.
@MikePHateWatchThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
War grifters gotta grift.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.