Of course the usual suspect Twitter warriors are screaming that this non-white member of Congress is abetting "white nationalism" by forging cross-ideological coalitions to curtail destructive US foreign policy. Idiotshttps://twitter.com/RoKhanna/status/1096467708831510530 …
-
-
His white nationalism is explicitly part of his foreign policy. Agreeing with conclusions without referencing his assumptions and arguments is naive and dangerous and, yes, helps peddle white nationalism to a wider audience.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I get that, but I think that that nuance can get lost with a phrase as vague as "alliance" which is part of why people have a strong reaction
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
But whether that's a good idea obviously depends on how bad Tucker is. He opposes interventionism for all the wrong reasons (nationalism over globalism) and you can't just lend legitimacy to a guy and then limit that legitimacy to just one issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is not a smart move strategically. A Tucker Carlson viewer who sees that tweet by Ro will only be LESS likely to adopt an anti-war stance. That's unfortunately how polarisation works. Which is why we can only win by winning.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.