This non-white member of Congress has been a leader in curtailing destructive foreign policy endeavors, such as Yemen and Venezuela. These endeavors overwhelmingly harm non-whites. But he's "abetting white nationalism" by seeking coalition allies to further the cause. Yeah, OK
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Perpetual violence against the global poor to own the cons.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Policy on who's behalf?....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Establishment Dems are perfectly happy with cross-ideological (ie, bipartisan) alliances to perpetuate destructive foreign policy, unlawful interventions and regime change wars, just not to curtail them. That would be against our “interests.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This is a fantastic comment
End of conversation
-
-
-
Are? You? Getting? It? Yet?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We can agree with dude while discourageing him from amplifying voices of hate.
-
Why not just admit that Tucker is the only mainstream journalist who opposes the bipartisan war agenda?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.