Withdrawing from the INF treaty (a move fully endorsed by NATO) is being spun as a gift to Putin. Something tells me that if Trump had stayed in the treaty, it'd also be spun as a gift to Putin. Foundational tenet of conspiracy theories: a core premise that is non-falsifiable
-
-
There's a sane, non-conspiratorial critique of Trump's withdrawal from the treaty that should be leveled. It could spur a nuclear arms race. It worsens relations with Russia, which is contrary to Trump's stated objectives. Instead, Dems parrot the same old paranoid nonsense
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're in over your head on this. Europeans have been fighting for months to keep the treaty alive. Listen to the arms control experts, not pundits on either side.
-
Why keep the treaty alive if only one side is adhering to it?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.