If the indictment had any substantive allegations of Stone having been complicit in *what Mueller is investigating* then he would not be walking around tooting his horn. But the indictment concerns procedural matters like perjury. It’s very thin.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wha’ppen to James Risen? Used to respect the guy, but he’s been scoring several own-goals the past year.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If the SC ends with a dud as I think it will, Mueller has some ‘splainin to do. At the point he knew there was no “there” there, he had a duty to remove the cloud of suspicion, even if he continued to plod along after process crimes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As we learn more about Rojor Stone there will come a point when a million women will wake up one morining and realize "he sounds just like my ex-husband."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Undercut by omission/ not charging criminal conspiracy and not mentioning "collution"? Or, undercut by saying he did not do any such thing?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's all about what Stone wanted from WikiLeaks, not what WikiLeaks gave him. Russia is still bull shit. There is no proof the Dems were "hacked" therefore certainly no proof Russia did it. Seth Rich "leaking" is as credible as Russia hacking.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wait until Michael Tracey learns what a superseding indictment is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For someone who's alleged completely innocent and has done nothing wrong, Roger Stone sure did expend a lot of effort trying to fight the Special Counsel. You know, usually people who've done nothing wrong have nothing to hide.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Risen's been a hardcore Russiagater from the very beginning. His entire article is pretty much "Stage 3 - Bargaining" about the fact that his conspiracy theory never held any weight to begin with.
-
is this the part where we start chanting
#LockHerUp or NO COLLUSION? - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Think about it, if Trump had to ask Bannon to ask Stone to ask Credo to ask WikiLeaks, how was Trump colluding with anybofy?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a coup
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Deceiving, as in LYING to your readers with malice aforethought.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What happens when Stone moves for discovery. Without Assange all they have is emails. But no source or origin. They can't even prove theit authenticity. It's a shitshow. Without being able to cross examine assange defence will piss all over Mueller on every one of these.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What statute would be violated by speaking with WikiLeaks? WikiLeaks can publish whatever they want. Did WikiLeaks steal anything?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
