Totally baseless assertion, and not supported by anything contained in the Stone indictment. There is no evidence that Trump officials had privileged knowledge of WikiLeaks releases. Then again, you'd expect nothing less from media coverage of this subjecthttps://twitter.com/FiveThirtyEight/status/1089206425149194242 …
-
-
When did the Trump tower meeting happened? You make it seem like they did nothing else, only this Roger Stone stuff.
-
They're all about separate things. The Trump Tower meeting had nothing to do with the emails Wikileaks eventually dumped.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sad one must point out the obvious...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Amazing how many so-called US liberals want Thoughtcrime to be an actual thing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtcrime …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@mtracey is not the sharpest mind in Twitterverse. He keeps saying the Mueller doc shows that the first connection between Stone & the Trump campaign occured after the initial WK cf. But the doc doesn't say Stone DIDN'T receive communications from the Trump campaign before it.pic.twitter.com/q9fC1EnvCu
-
So, Stone is not being indicted for any of those communications, or they would have been mentioned as counts in the indictment.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
After .........What a Witch Hunt!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So the whole thing rests on "it was not just telephonic communications, but somebody sent an email, too." ? This is so far beyond parody. It's Exhibit R that Joy Behar was right, in spite of herself: everything boils down to "Get Trump!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And what is Robert "BoyScout" Mueller's excuse for why he has shown ZERO CURIOSITY ABOUT a) What Assange knows or b) The whereabouts and contents of the supposedly "HACKED SERVER" ?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Democrats aren't the sharpest tools in the shed. They keep hanging their hats on this & keep getting NOTHING but process crimes or "old crimes" by Manafort & Cohen. Strong arm tactics to try & squeeze the President, gestapo type pre-dawn raids with guns drawn on OLD MEN. NADA.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Odd definition of collusion, then! If that's the case, every major news network was "colluding" with Wikileaks. And we have YET to establish that Assange got info from the Russians anyway!
-
We haven't established that, but because of the Mueller indictment of the 12 or 13 Russians, that Wikileaks got the info from Russians is accepted as an axiom in the case unless Crowdstrike's report can be buried. Mueller is using that more than dossier now.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.