Are we seriously going to excuse tulsi’s anti LGBTQ past with a poorly constructed whataboutism? How bout we just accept that she, like many of us including me, have a shitty past and see where we stand today?https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1085178216594198534 …
-
-
That’s not legit. It’s whack. Crack level whackpic.twitter.com/fFsMh8NGKS
-
And in case you need further explanation, She has to answer for her shit on her own. Using Obama as a deflection is not a “legitimate” question. It’s an easy way to keep her from answering for herself which she needs to do
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Because there's strong evidence she hasn't reformed her positions as much as her voting record would lead one to believe.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If it was Trump that said that 40 years ago Benjamin and his ilk would be having a conniption
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, because you have a clear and repeated pattern of doing it and we all know you're not interested in facts, debate, or staying on topic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
its problematic michael!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's a frequently used ploy to avoid explaining inconsistency in the application of the standards people want to hold *some* people to.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
You didn't answer his question lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A democrat who is willing to be even a little skeptical of the LGBTQ agenda would be so refreshing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.