Feel free to let us know why it's not a big deal that David Duke and Richard Spencer love her so much. Go ahead and defend her anti-lgbt record while you're at it. lol.
-
-
-
It is a big deal, and it is a definite black mark. But, if she is the most anti war candidate then she is the most qualified candidate. Ever hear of climate change? Wont matter what rights we have in 12 short years.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
I want one of the progressive journalists/anchor to do an hour long interview with Tulsi, & ask her about her policy, stance, affiliation, so that everyone in america can be exposed to the truth. I really request
@AnaKasparian ,@KyleKulinski ,@dpakman ,@ggreenwald ,@jimmy_doreThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wonder if the DNC will now push Warren harder, as she has pretended to care about ending the wars—a popular idea that they would prefer to marginalize, but now must contend with—and they know that Warren, unlike
#TulsiGabbard—can easily be co-opted by the war machine later.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For Gabbard, I am more concerned whether she actually is progressive on domestic policies or if it is just a farce to win over the Bernie-wing. Took her so long to support M4A.
-
Progressivism is cancer. They don't want 'progress' (whatever that might mean). They want a huge government and massive entitlement programs. Many of them are closet communists. They want big government control of everything like China. That's not progress. It's a dystopia.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But why is it that it’s okay for democrats to support those who financially benefited and aid the israelie aparthiedpic.twitter.com/hSvzRsidAb
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's the most positive thing about her.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Why do mainstream Democrats do that? They never respond to what a person is saying but instead dig up something they said or did, often years before and throw it back at them. Isn't that a classically David Brock style Republican/Tea Party tactic from 15-20 years ago?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What about their rule of not attacking their own.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What's wrong with defending Assad? There MSM kept lying about him (gas attacks etc.) and Tulsi told the truth, and good for her. It took courage.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They will be tough, because their paymasters are experienced- but good luck and do it!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The same people who were saying a week ago that it's not okay to criticize Beto & other Dems or look at their voting record, now are stampeding each other to dogpile on Tulsi Gabbard, because she tried diplomacy in Syria instead of backing Al Qaeda rebels for more regime change.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No, I haven't. A lot of people I know aren't super details foreign policy followers. I don't think it's bad, most are just exhausted from dealing with things right here.
End of conversation
-
-
-
"Democrat" is all I need to know. I'll never trust a democrat again. EV-ER
-
Smart person.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Sarcasm?
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.