I don't think emerging orthodoxies shouldn't be challenged. What I object to is being called one of the "useful idiots of big business," having the history of the anti-state left being erased, and having serious, intelligent arguments ignored or treated as reflexive anti-Trumpismhttps://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1065389049853153280 …
-
-
I believe arguments should be responded to, and I'll respond to this piece. But people are perfectly justified in being angry after being dismissed as "useful idiots." Angela is the one who initially used unfair, insulting language instead of fairly engaging with the other side.
-
There's no doubt that she wrote it in part as a provocation. So I understand the anger on that level.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.