I don't think emerging orthodoxies shouldn't be challenged. What I object to is being called one of the "useful idiots of big business," having the history of the anti-state left being erased, and having serious, intelligent arguments ignored or treated as reflexive anti-Trumpismhttps://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1065389049853153280 …
-
-
Why would Angela refuse to engage seriously with the actual morally serious arguments of the "open borders left"? Why would you say that we're afraid of the arguments because we know we can't answer them? We do have answers, but Angela didn't quote them or interview anyone.
-
Yes, many people on the left are unreasonable. But if a writer is going to make a case AGAINST open borders, they have to deal with the best arguments FOR open borders, NOT ignore the smart arguments and distort left history to suggest arguments for free movement are new.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I feel like you’re so goddamn high on your own farts you don’t even grasp what the fuck you’re talking about anymore.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.