Trying to prove "perjury" is a dead-end and not even necessary. Kavanaugh made multiple false or misleading statements, which in aggregate indicates a clear pattern of deception. That should be more than enough to disqualify him politically.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Under oath? As a federal judge and skilled lawyer? Yes. That's a circumstance where statements are ALWAYS finely parsed to determine their truth or falsity.
- 10 more replies
-
-
-
I respectfully disagree. An inference can be drawn that if Keyser never met him as she recalls, then the event didn’t happen (bc 4 people at a house would be extremely likely to meet). You might not draw that inference, but someone could easily draw that inference.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Omg. Are you serious?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Weak argument you’re proposing here... he’s ‘Parsing’? Let’s do better
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s basically saying it didn’t happen. In Fords version her friend was there. Her friend denies it. Therefore that version of events didn’t happen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If that’s your standard for deception then I think ‘god’ may be the only person that would qualify to your standards.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Talk about Talmudry, man.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.