Christ almighty. His testimony in the previous paragraph is about how he attended parties with friends where they drank. Obviously by “like this” he could mean “where felonies happen” or where “Leland way present” all that wouldhttps://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1046530250627256321 …
Specious. He made a specific claim intended to bolster his wider denial. This claim, even when rendered as charitably as possible, doesn’t hold up to scrutiny. We’re talking about under-oath testimony from a federal judge, not creative nonfiction. The highest standards apply.
-
-
His specific claim was “like the one” described by Ford. Since Leyland says she never met him or was at a party with him, we should conclude he’s telling the truth. And not that he meant, “I never got together with friends and drank beer” which he talked about doing at length
-
Leland actually said she “does not know” Kavanaugh and “has no recollection” of the gathering which may sound like a trivial distinction, but doesn’t preclude the possibility that she did in fact attend the gathering. Talented lawyers are wording these statements very precisely.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Your read of that is that he's saying he never attended an alcohol party? LOL.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All because of the progressive zeitgeist that has been thrust upon the culture that could never be accomplished legislatively we are are fighting over one lawyer like it’s life or death the founders knew people lacked virtue tried and failed to deal with it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.