This intensive Talmudic analysis of Kavanaugh’s yearbook references is getting bizarre. Slang terms evolve, teenage inside jokes are often multi-layered and inscrutable to outsiders: just seems like a really trivial fixation when there are so many legitimate reasons to oppose him
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Hair-splitting, meaning exceedingly precise evaluation of claims, is exactly what’s needed here to ascertain the truth.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
Yea, no it doesn't do that. Its an exhaustive attempt at plausibility and making mountains out semantic molehills. Evidence may be out there but this is not it.
-
He ACTUALLY said: "The core of why we’re here is an allegation for which the 4 witnesses present have all said it didn’t happen” What they said was they don't recall a random summer night hangout from 36 yrs ago. Kavanaugh's claim is astonishingly deceitful or logically deluded.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
The core argument appears to be that a lack of evidence can be fixed without providing evidence. Which will always be unpersuasive. Author's specific points are weak, ranging from selective quoting, to being upset at answers that provide extra context, to speculation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Confirmation bias is one helluva drug
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Written by Seth Abramson.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good article which goes to the crux of why Kavanaugh should be removed from the judiciary.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm surprised you aren't arguing that Kavanaugh is "no worse than Garland," you know, since Garland is a mainstream moderate, not "my policy and views are the only truths and those who disagree are idiots or evil" kind of guy. And he's probably a "warmonger" too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not very persuasive to me, and clearly tilted. Throw it on the pile.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And yet the Democrats deify Beto O'Rourke who not only attempted to flee from the scene of a drunken accident, he flat out LIED about it on national television. Even the Washington Post called him out. Yet he is the Democrats' "rising star!!!!!!!" with all the mouth drooling.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
no one thinks the case hinges on the yearbook but it’s obviously germane to his character & credibility, particularly when a line against Ford complains of no ‘contemporary’ evidence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even if Kavanaugh is lying, he needs to be confirmed anyway -- our system can't function if orchestrated late hits like this, and the one on Clarence Thomas in 1991, are rewarded.
@instapunditThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NathanJRobinson We saw as many 'lies' and inconsistencies in Ford's testimony as you saw in Kav's. The most troubling for me: Ford vacillating on whether the attack happened in '82 or mid 80s. Mid 80s is consistent with her saying she went on to have 4 hard yrs of college.pic.twitter.com/fBDrYaF2P2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.