Ok, got a variety of answers explaining the basis for the contempt. Thanks!
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ya mean the only guy who’s doing anything meaningful to save the planet with innovation?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe you should look into what his companies are actually doing. He builds Ponzi schemes. That’s all he does.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If being a billionaire wasn’t offensive enough, he dated Amber Heard.
#whathavewebecome -
Being a billionaire isn't automatically offensive. It depends what you've built and all the jobs you've created. But Socialists look past all that and drown in their pathetic little envy.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
He thinks he's the Smartest Guy on the Planet. He's not expecting the rest of us to pick up on the Emperor's lack of garments. And appears to be running the biggest financial fraud of the the 21st century, in plain site. Some of us find fraudsters contemptible. Weird I know.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
He's a freaking genius who's having a mid-life crisis, hopped in bed with a hot little cookie, smoked some pot. I can't tell you how many old Wall St bosses did this. I bet he shakes this off, takes his hits and comes back harder. I'm just pissed I didn't get a flamethrower
-
It's just a repackaged roofing torch, you can buy one at a home improvement store.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Intrinsically offensive? Cmon Michael. You are doing ok by capitalism.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
"Intrinsically offensive"? And yet I, somehow, am not offended.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.