it was embargoed. come on man.
-
-
Replying to @KELLYWEILL
Impressed that Oliver complied with the embargo with such dutiful precision
2 replies 4 retweets 75 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
would you have broken an embargo you agreed to? that's not right by me.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @KELLYWEILL
Probably not depending on the circumstance but I would also take steps to not give the impression of weird corporate coordination
3 replies 2 retweets 60 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
Gotcha, I find breaking an embargo dishonest if I agreed to it, but that's my honor not yours. Re: timing, everyone's stories dropped as soon as the embargo lifted, as I'm sure you've witnessed plenty in the past.
3 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @KELLYWEILL
Again my issue is not abiding by an embargo you agreed to, it's the bizarre to-the-minute coordination, which has weird connotations and (not totally unreasonably) can breed suspicion
6 replies 2 retweets 56 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
People publish as soon as they can, ie. when the embargo they agreed to ends. Pretty simple stuff.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @SamAdlerBell @KELLYWEILL
Pretty sad statement that coordinating to-the-minute with a huge corporation to promulgate their press release is "how journalism works." I remember when Gawker used to mock that kind of thing
0 replies 2 retweets 6 likes
Yeah, as I've said several times I don't believe it was a sinister plot -- coordinated corporate PR is bad enough
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.