It’s also possible that they’re very selectively opposing President Trump when he should be. You can’t give credence to only one possibility especially when we know so little (eg author of article).
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the writer discussed that the preference for dictators & anti-democratic is the impulse, which is accurate even if this person is complicit in it. What was repudiated? His foreign policy is punitive & getting along better with Russian bombing misinterpreted as “dovish.”pic.twitter.com/JXE9hXZFzF
-
It’s not heterodox —it’s war on terror neocon AND ethnonationalist isolation, doing the minimum for the victims of these policies (bans, restricting aid), allowing a refugee crisis which ignites the far right. Threats mixed with dismantling what’s left of democracy into autocracy
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Funny, you never saw the defeat of protectionists in previous elections as decisive repudiations of *their ideas. But one victory for the protectionists and it's 'decisive' in your mind
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly right. President Trump warned off Syria, Russia and Iran from attacking Idlib in a tweet. Today, the leaders of Russia, Iran and Turkey are meeting again to try to achieve peace.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.