Nope. All wrong. Manafort worked with the side committed to Russia. Engage Ukraine was about pushing Ukraine’s image in Europe. But he was never clearly for EU membership.https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/mar/05/ukraine-russia-relations-viktor-yanukovych …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s not true at all. Manafort was in the Ukraine working for Putin “ to install a Russia puppet as president there. He helped mount a similar disinformation campaign against a leading opponent with the catch phrase ‘lock her up’. And they did. Now she’s out and Manafort is in.
-
And the Barack Obama administration was setting up alliances with Ukrainian Nazi thugs, for the sake of the EU oligarchy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Pre-election he ran a pro-EU platform to win the vote. Post-election he ran pro-Kremlin and pocketed even more money. Because politicians never run on one platform to win an election then switch platforms for profit/expedience....

-
You seem to be confusing Paul Manafort with elected officials.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, because he did ONE THING contrary to Russian interests that means he can't possibly be working for the Russians at all, yeah, THAT'S NOT A LOGICAL FALLACY ONE IOTA. You sure you're a journalist?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
He got paid millions of dollars by Putin to lobby against Putin's interests. Makes sense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Michael...this is simply not true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Its Mueller time baby! We shall not let facts get in our way. In Mueller we trust. All hail the CIA & FBI (in my Ashton Kutcher voice).
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
How are you making that assertion when Manafort helped elect Yanukovych, a member of the pro-Russia Party of Regions?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
“Quasi-religious”. Indeed. We can make all of the arguments with reason and logic but they won’t take in that environment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Contrary!?! That's absolutely untrue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did you read the report though?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes yes, Yanukovych was totally not pro-Putin, that’s why he fled to Russia under Putin’s personal protection after he was deposed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your romantic view of your theory fails to realize the power of hedging by governments, large corporations, industries and wealthy families and individuals. Wake up! Manafort’s efforts in Ukraine were backed by Russians and Ukrainians and this would get him paid by all sides.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He worked for Yanukovych for 10 years, Putin’s puppet in Ukraine. He was paid millions by oligarchs (eg Deripaska) loyal to Putin.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.