Sounds roughly accurate. But in this instance the "consequences" were meted out by a handful of unduly powerful corporate officials working in secret, so I'm disinclined to view it as wholly "good" even if you're correct that pressure is what facilitated the outcome.
-
-
I think many of them have been on a "fake news" extermination crusade since sometime in November 2016, and they would've sought out this change with or without constituent/consumer demands. It's an ideological project for them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.